Judgment of Supreme Court of Czech Republic of 27 November 2013 in Case No. 23 Cdo 2542/2011: (i) Place of Arbitration, (ii) Foreign Arbitral Award, (iii) Jurisdiction of Czech Courts to Annul Arbitral Award If Parties Have Agreed on Place of Arbitration Abroad, (iv) Possibility of Subjective Internationalization of Domestic Disputes in Consequence of Parties’ Autonomy
keywords
ambiguityautonomy
auxiliary function of court
Brussels I
domestic arbitral award
domestic dispute
enforcement of arbitral award
error in writing
foreign arbitral award
freedom of contract
international dimension
international dispute
interpretation of juridical act
jurisdiction of Czech courts
jurisdiction to annul arbitral award
New York Convention (1958)
ordre public
place of arbitration
place of residence of party
place where the arbitral award is made
preliminary issue/reference for preliminary ruling
public policy
recognition of arbitral award
registered office of party
seat of arbitration
subjective internationalization of dispute
supervisory function of court
validity of arbitration agreement
validity of arbitration clause
about the authors
Univ. Professor, Dr.iur., Mgr., Dipl. Ing. oec/MB, Dr.h.c. Lawyer admitted and practising in Prague/CZE (Branch N.J./US), Senior Partner of the Law Offices Bělohlávek, Dept. of Law, Faculty of Economics, Ostrava, CZE, Dept. of Int. and European Law, Faculty of Law, Masaryk University, Brno, CZE (visiting), Chairman of the Commission on Arbitration ICC National Committee CZE, Arbitrator in Prague, Vienna, Kiev etc. Member of ASA, DIS, Austrian Arb. Association. The President of the WJA – the World Jurist Association, Washington D.C./USA.
e-mail: office@ablegal.cz
