Judgment of Supreme Court CR, Case No. 23 Cdo 3116/2012, of September 19, 2013: (i) Allowing Party to State (Plead) Their Case, (ii) Annulment of Arbitral Award for Failure to Meet Such Obligation under Section 31(e) of the ArbAct, and (iii) Duty to Appoint Interpreter for Party When Such Need Arises in Course of Proceedings
keywords
annulment (setting aside) of arbitral awardequal opportunity to assert one’s rights
equality of the parties
exercise of procedural rights
interpreter
language of the proceedings
opportunity to state (plead) one’s case
violation of procedural rights
about the authors
Univ. Professor, Dr.iur., Mgr., Dipl. Ing. oec/MB, Dr.h.c. Lawyer admitted and practising in Prague/CZE (Branch N.J./US), Senior Partner of the Law Offices Bělohlávek, Dept. of Law, Faculty of Economics, Ostrava, CZE, Dept. of Int. and European Law, Faculty of Law, Masaryk University, Brno, CZE (visiting), Chairman of the Commission on Arbitration ICC National Committee CZE, Arbitrator in Prague, Vienna, Kiev etc. Member of ASA, DIS, Austrian Arb. Association. The President of the WJA – the World Jurist Association, Washington D.C./USA.
e-mail: office@ablegal.cz
